On Tue, Jan 6, 2026 at 8:09 PM VASUKI M <vasukianand0119@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Yeah,the proposed idea makes sense to me,as users will almost see at the end of log messages it will be easy to find
outwhat is the checkpoint reason.
> +1 for it.
If we do this, it would be better to keep the wording consistent between
the checkpoint starting and completion messages. For example,
the patch represents CHECKPOINT_FAST as "immediate",
while the checkpoint starting message uses "fast"; those should match.
I'm also wondering why this information is currently included only in
the checkpoint starting message. I tried to find any past discussion on this,
but couldn’t find one.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao