Re: client_connection_check_interval default value - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 4:05 PM Hüseyin Demir <huseyin.d3r@gmail.com> wrote:
> The new v2 patch looks good to me.
>
> One open question from my side is should we include a test for this
> behaviour ? Because we mentioned adding a different GUC in the future
> to manage this rate-limiting approach. It can be useful in the future
> once we consider/re-visit this approach. If the tests and other future
> ideas can be developed later together we can consider adding tests
> later.

I agree it's worth adding such tests. From a quick look at the regression tests,
there don't seem to be any tests for log_lock_waits itself. So before adding
tests for the behavior introduced by the patch, we might first need to add
some basic tests for log_lock_waits.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao