Re: Need to backpatch 2985e16 to 9.3 and further (HS regression test out) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: Need to backpatch 2985e16 to 9.3 and further (HS regression test out)
Date
Msg-id CAHGQGwGF5m6v_83CQ8MXHGcdzXN1U0iDfkUAfq-TryOORxBsJw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Need to backpatch 2985e16 to 9.3 and further (HS regression test out)  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Need to backpatch 2985e16 to 9.3 and further (HS regression test out)  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Following (commit 2985e16) has not been backpatched, I guess.
>>>
>>>  ANALYZE hs1;
>>> -ERROR:  cannot execute VACUUM during recovery
>>> +ERROR:  cannot execute ANALYZE during recovery
>>>
>>> Attached is a patch for this.
>>
>> Why did you cut off the following part? ISTM that also needs to be back-patched.
>> So we should just do "git cherry-pick 2985e16" on 9.3.
>>
>> -begin transaction isolation level serializable;
>> +begin transaction isolation level repeatable read;
>>
>
> You are right, I did not pay attention to that at all.
> Please find attached = 2985e16 ;-)

Do we need to back-patch this to older versions (i,e. 9.2, 9.1, ..)?

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Need to backpatch 2985e16 to 9.3 and further (HS regression test out)
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Need to backpatch 2985e16 to 9.3 and further (HS regression test out)