On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 7:07 PM Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the patch — that was my oversight.
>
> LGTM with one small suggestion:
Thanks for the review!
> The comment says: "If the option is not found in connInfo, return NULL value."
>
> Since the parameter is named `keyword`, I'd suggest: "If the keyword is not found in connInfo, return NULL."
>
> This keeps terminology consistent with the function signature.
I think "the option with the given keyword" is more precise than just
"the keyword".
That said, simply using "the option" also seems sufficient in this context...
Regarding 0002 patch, I found that it caused a CI failure, so I’ve updated
the patch to fix that. The revised patch is attached.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao