Re: Use SIGTERM instead of SIGUSR1 for slotsync worker to exit during promotion? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: Use SIGTERM instead of SIGUSR1 for slotsync worker to exit during promotion?
Date
Msg-id CAHGQGwFKULfab1NH1+_-+GdpJ8itUaKGU0_4Uwcr-y0MLZchyQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Use SIGTERM instead of SIGUSR1 for slotsync worker to exit during promotion?  (Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Use SIGTERM instead of SIGUSR1 for slotsync worker to exit during promotion?
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 1:01 PM Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Fujii-san,
>
> I tried reproducing the wait scenario as you mentioned, but could not
> reproduce it.
> Steps I followed:
> 1) Place a debugger in the slotsync worker and hold it at
> fetch_remote_slots() ... -> libpqsrv_get_result()
> 2) Kill the primary.
> 3) Triggered promotion of the standby and release debugger from slotsync worker.
>
> The slot sync worker stops when the promotion is triggered and then
> restarts, but fails to connect to the primary. The promotion happens
> immediately.
> ```
> LOG:  received promote request
> LOG:  redo done at 0/0301AD40 system usage: CPU: user: 0.00 s, system:
> 0.02 s, elapsed: 4574.89 s
> LOG:  last completed transaction was at log time 2026-03-23
> 17:13:15.782313+05:30
> LOG:  replication slot synchronization worker will stop because
> promotion is triggered
> LOG:  slot sync worker started
> ERROR:  synchronization worker "slotsync worker" could not connect to
> the primary server: connection to server at "127.0.0.1", port 9933
> failed: Connection refused
> Is the server running on that host and accepting TCP/IP connections?
> ```
>
> I’ll debug this further to understand it better.
> In the meantime, please let me know if I’m missing any step, or if you
> followed a specific setup/script to reproduce this scenario.

Thanks for testing!

If you killed the primary with a signal like SIGTERM, an RST packet might have
been sent to the slotsync worker at that moment. That allowed the worker to
detect the connection loss and exited the wait state, so promotion could
complete as expected.

To reproduce the issue, you'll need a scenario where the worker cannot detect
the connection loss. For example, you could block network traffic (e.g., with
iptables) between the primary and the slotsync worker. The key is to create
a situation where the worker remains stuck waiting for input for a long time.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nishant Sharma
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUG] CRASH: ECPGprepared_statement() and ECPGdeallocate_all() when connection is NULL
Next
From: Lukas Fittl
Date:
Subject: Re: Stack-based tracking of per-node WAL/buffer usage