Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation
Date
Msg-id CAHGQGwFGY+GuQSWyGjGksRxxHG3m-17hLrMKwQ+uYHS6_MxGTQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation  (Sameer Thakur <samthakur74@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Sameer Thakur <samthakur74@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >You seem to have forgotten to include the pg_stat_statements--1.2.sql
>>> >and pg_stat_statements--1.1--1.2.sql in the patch.
>>> Sorry again. Please find updated patch attached.
>
> I did not add pg_stat_statements--1.2.sql. I have added that now and updated
> the patch again.

Thanks!

I got the segmentation fault when I tested the case where the least-executed
query statistics is discarded, i.e., when I executed different queries more than
pg_stat_statements.max times. I guess that the patch might have a bug.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: Re: record identical operator
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: dynamic shared memory