Re: pg_basebackup --xlog compatibility break - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: pg_basebackup --xlog compatibility break
Date
Msg-id CAHGQGwEW+7_=DWqwPUQDzMTsSL=GWwK4m4gKfUxgN0AnMZC5Sg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_basebackup --xlog compatibility break  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> On sön, 2012-06-10 at 13:43 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
>> > On tis, 2012-05-29 at 22:31 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> >> Yeah, good arguments all around, i agree too :-) Next question is -
>> >> suggestions for naming of said paramter?
>> >
>> > --xlog-method=something?  And/or -Xsomething, which would automatically
>> > enable -x?
>>
>> How's this?
>
> I wouldn't make -x and -X exclusive.  The way I understood this is, -x
> means include xlog, and -X says how to.

And we can specify -X without -x like -Z and -z option of pg_basebackup?
If no, I disagree with you because I don't want to specify two options to
use log streaming method.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.3: load path to mitigate load penalty for checksums
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Run pgindent on 9.2 source tree in preparation for first 9.3