Re: Weird behaviour with binary copy, arrays and column count - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From James Vanns
Subject Re: Weird behaviour with binary copy, arrays and column count
Date
Msg-id CAH7vdhNxE9CUyXLGPVNayHWouLsY-dy9utrL6OkYhtL3dDzyDg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Weird behaviour with binary copy, arrays and column count  (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
That's a good tip! Can't believe I hadn't even thought of that! :/

Cheers

Jim

On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 21:59, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 8 Jul 2022 at 13:09, James Vanns <jvanns@ilm.com> wrote:
> >
> > It does seem to smell of an alignment, padding, buffer overrun, parsing kind of error.
>
> It does.... I think you may need to bust out a debugger and see what
> array_recv is actually seeing...
>
> --
> greg



-- 
Jim Vanns
Principal Production Engineer
Industrial Light & Magic, London



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: Custom tuplesorts for extensions
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUG] Logical replication failure "ERROR: could not map filenode "base/13237/442428" to relation OID" with catalog modifying txns