On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 12:11 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 11:01:59PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > I think slight variations don't really detract from the value of the > product, and consider the odd variation a reminder of the diversity of > the project. I don't suggest that we purposefully introduce spelling > variations, or that we refrain from fixing ones that appear in code > we're changing, but I don't see the point in changing a line for the > sole reason of standardising the spelling of a word.
Agreed. This always reminds me of ANALYZE vs. ANALYSE where we don't actually document the latter :)
I didn't know about that. That's a fun one!
> That said, I'm not a native English speaker.
Neither am I.
I am. Consistency is nice but either reads fine to me. Only brought it up as I didn't see many other usages so seemed out of place.
