Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nitin Motiani
Subject Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects
Date
Msg-id CAH5HC96=3NjeYA5vuj8CyMmiFhU27jgvQ9WgXbUDccrE7xvwYw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 8:21 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Also just would like to confirm that the pg_dump_sort change will go in a
> > different patch.
>
> That's already been committed: http://postgr.es/c/fb6c860.
>

That's great. Thank you.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Rahila Syed
Date:
Subject: Re: Enhancing Memory Context Statistics Reporting
Next
From: Bernd Helmle
Date:
Subject: Re: Changing the state of data checksums in a running cluster