Re: Improve error message for duplicate labels in enum types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Rahila Syed
Subject Re: Improve error message for duplicate labels in enum types
Date
Msg-id CAH2L28vQ24HsL4WcNys1FtHSVBMRbTnFDhbbmM9mvZPz4tawjQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Improve error message for duplicate labels in enum types  (Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Yugo,

 
Currently, when creating an enum type, duplicate labels are caught by a unique
index on pg_enum, resulting in a generic error message.

 postgres=# create type t as enum ('a','b','a');
 ERROR:  duplicate key value violates unique constraint "pg_enum_typid_label_index"
 DETAIL:  Key (enumtypid, enumlabel)=(16418, a) already exists.

I propose adding an explicit check for duplicate labels during enum creation,
so that a more user-friendly and descriptive error message can be produced,
similar to what is already done in ALTER TYPE ... ADD VALUE
or ALTER TYPE ... RENAME VALUE .. TO ....

With the attached patch applied, the error message becomes:

ERROR:  label "a" used more than once
 
 Thank you for sharing the patch.
+1 to the idea of improving the error message.

Please take the following points mentioned into consideration.
 
1. I’m considering whether there might be a more efficient way to handle this.
The current method adds an extra loop to check for duplicates, in addition to the existing duplicate index check,
even when no duplicates are present. Would it be possible to achieve this by wrapping the following
insert call in a PG_TRY() and PG_CATCH() block and logging more descriptive error in the PG_CATCH() block?

CatalogTuplesMultiInsertWithInfo(pg_enum, slot, slotCount,
                                                                                         indstate);

2. If we choose to include the check in the 0001 patch you provided, would it make more sense to place
it earlier in the function, before assigning OIDs to the labels and running qsort? This way, we could
catch duplicates sooner and prevent unnecessary processing.

Thank you,
Rahila Syed

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Richard Guo
Date:
Subject: Re: Pathify RHS unique-ification for semijoin planning
Next
From: Japin Li
Date:
Subject: Re: Making pg_rewind faster