Hi,
> How about a simpler injection_points_attach(point_name text, func
> text, module text) with a second SQL function, but a different number
> of arguments? Using a new hardcoded action for this purpose is
> confusing as your point is to introduce a SQL wrapper on top of
> InjectionPointAttach(), and using input arguments that match with the
> C function is an attractive option.
Thank you for the suggestion.
I agree that having a separate SQL function for this would make the design
easier to understand.
Please find attached a patch that implements this.
Thank you,
Rahila Syed
