> This is v19 work, so I am adding that to the next commit fest.
Rebased, to fix a conflict I've introduced with a different commit.
Thank you for the rebased patches. I reviewed the code and have a few comments for your consideration.
It appears that Github CI is reporting failures with injection_points/002_data_persist failing across all OSes.
Following are comments on v2-0002-injection_points-Add-function-to-flush-injection-.patch 1. /* + * Rename file into place, so we atomically replace any old one. + */ + (void) durable_rename(INJ_DUMP_FILE_TMP, INJ_DUMP_FILE, LOG);
I wonder if it would be better to include a check for the return value of `durable_rename` to manage potential failure scenarios.
Could we perhaps add a brief comment clarifying the rationale behind the use of a temporary file in this context?
3. + if (fread(buf, 1, len + 1, file) != len + 1)
+ goto error; + library = pstrdup(buf);
It seems that `buf` should be null-terminated before being passed to `pstrdup(buf)`. Otherwise, `strlen` might not accurately determine the length. This seems to be consistent with the handling of `fread` calls in `snapmgr.c`.
