Re: [HACKERS] Decimal64 and Decimal128 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Decimal64 and Decimal128
Date
Msg-id CAH2-WznkjNA0jO_Ac=to2tvGxSS9BmDQZpotXOUs5z9Py28RGQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Decimal64 and Decimal128  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Decimal64 and Decimal128  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've never been very happy with the performance of numeric, so I guess
> I'm a bit more optimistic about the chances of doing better.  Aside
> from any computational optimizations, the fact that the datatype could
> be pass-by-value rather than a varlena might speed things up quite a
> bit in some cases.

What cases do you have in mind?


-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Artus de benque
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Postgresql bug report - unexpected behavior of suppress_redundant_updates_trigger
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Postgresql bug report - unexpected behavior ofsuppress_redundant_updates_trigger