Re: Unifying VACUUM VERBOSE and log_autovacuum_min_duration output - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Unifying VACUUM VERBOSE and log_autovacuum_min_duration output
Date
Msg-id CAH2-WznhgXAuReLJccR-WSVX8x_OJxYB3hOwqvL9U=p8eD=trQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unifying VACUUM VERBOSE and log_autovacuum_min_duration output  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 1:13 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> Yes -- in order to report aggressiveness in VACUUM VERBOSE. But the
> autovacuum case still reports verbose-ness, in the same way as it
> always has -- in that same LOG entry. We don't want to repeat
> ourselves in the VERBOSE case, which will have already indicated its
> verboseness in the up-front ereport().

Sorry, I meant "indicated its aggressiveness in the up-front ereport()".

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Unifying VACUUM VERBOSE and log_autovacuum_min_duration output
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Building postgresql from sources, statically linked, linux