Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Should logtape.c blocks be of type long? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Should logtape.c blocks be of type long?
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wznebmt-kDD35qAn-t6vUhtH6iTVxEGWBq7ihNUZ16HK4Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Should logtape.c blocks be of type long?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Should logtape.c blocks be of type long?
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 9:46 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> So, attached is a patch to change these longs to int64.  Any thoughts?

No new thoughts. I'm still all in favor of this. Thanks for picking it up.

At some point we should completely ban the use of "long".

--
Peter Geoghegan

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: 程ゆき
Date:
Subject: Try adding type cast with tablespace
Next
From: Ryoga Yoshida
Date:
Subject: Doesn't pgstat_report_wal() handle the argument "force" incorrectly