On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 1:47 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> This flips one expected result to another order from what it was.
> (I experimented with OID-descending sort, but that flips two
> other expected results.)
I think that that's fine, provided that the order is consistent going forward.
> If no objections, I'll push shortly.
Sounds good.
--
Peter Geoghegan