On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> But yeah, the existing code raises false positive serialization
> failures under SERIALIZABLE, and that's visible in the isolation test
> I posted: there is actually a serial order of those transactions with
> the same result.
I was under the impression that false positives of this kind are
allowed by SSI. Why focus on this false positive scenario in
particular?
--
Peter Geoghegan
