Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: HashAgg's batching counter starts at 0, but Hash's starts at 1. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: HashAgg's batching counter starts at 0, but Hash's starts at 1.
Date
Msg-id CAH2-WzmsVvd88W=uE-wSz83PjN-Lz=mme2_jxEhOVVEpEu2CsA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: HashAgg's batching counter starts at 0, but Hash's starts at 1.  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
Responses Re: HashAgg's batching counter starts at 0, but Hash's starts at 1. (now: incremental sort)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 9:05 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
> So my 2ndary suggestion is to conditionalize based on the method rather than
> value of space used.

What's the advantage of doing it that way?

-- 
Peter Geoghegan

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: HashAgg's batching counter starts at 0, but Hash's starts at 1.
Next
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: IDEA: pg_stat_statements tracking utility statements by tag?