On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 11:13 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > Right. Besides, adding something along the lines Michael described
> > necessitates fixing the problems that it creates. We'll run out of
> > blocks of 5 contiguous OIDs (or whatever) far sooner than we'll run
> > out of single OIDs.
>
> Well, if we ever get even close to that situation, this whole approach
> isn't really gonna work.
My point was that I don't see any reason to draw the line at or after
what Michael suggested, but before handling the exhaustion of
available blocks of 5 contiguous OIDs in the range 8000-9999. It's
just busy work.
--
Peter Geoghegan
