Re: amcheck verification for GiST - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: amcheck verification for GiST
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wzmh74tKkcTwmnxirY+Dj23C_0RKkwbB1bD768Le3r70LQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: amcheck verification for GiST  (Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:30 PM Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
> Here's updated patch with AccessShareLock.
> I've tried to stress this with combination of random inserts, vaccuums and checks. This process neither failed, nor
deadlocked.
> The patch intentionally contains one superflous line to make gist logically broken. This triggers regression test of
amcheck.

Any thoughts on this, Heikki?

It would be nice to be able to squeeze this into Postgres 12,
especially given that GiST has been enhanced for 12 already.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Fred .Flintstone"
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL pollutes the file system
Next
From: pantilimonov misha
Date:
Subject: Re: [GSoC] application ideas