GlobalVisIsRemovableFullXid() vs GlobalVisCheckRemovableXid() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject GlobalVisIsRemovableFullXid() vs GlobalVisCheckRemovableXid()
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wzmes12jFNDcVgpU89Vp=r6uLFrE-MT0fjSWGsE70UiNaA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: GlobalVisIsRemovableFullXid() vs GlobalVisCheckRemovableXid()  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Why is GlobalVisIsRemovableFullXid() not named
GlobalVisCheckRemovableFullXid() instead? ISTM that that name makes
much more sense, since it is what I'd expect for a function that is
the "Full XID equivalent" of GlobalVisCheckRemovableXid().

Note also that GlobalVisIsRemovableFullXid() is the only symbol name
matching "GlobalVisIsRemovable*".

Have I missed something?

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Zhihong Yu
Date:
Subject: Re: CLUSTER on partitioned index
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: Preserve attstattarget on REINDEX CONCURRENTLY