Re: Ideas for a relcache test mode about missing invalidations - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Ideas for a relcache test mode about missing invalidations
Date
Msg-id CAH2-WzmXcHXa0MKx5a9NiaaCOE4E4T_rnaHa-N4gN-VoWUT8aw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Ideas for a relcache test mode about missing invalidations  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Ideas for a relcache test mode about missing invalidations
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 12:34 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> I reread through the thread and IUCC, drop_index() is sending
>> inval on the owing relation and invalidation happens (that is,
>
> I finally understand that I was totally inept. This came from
> *the result* of the original -bug thread.

I certainly would not say that you were in any way inept. Perhaps
there is an argument for *also* doing what you propose. I am not
dismissive of your idea.

It seems like a question that should be considered separately, on
another thread. If you still want to pursue it.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Draft release notes are up
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: hot_standby_feedback vs excludeVacuum and snapshots