Re: [PATCH] Clarify the behavior of the system when approaching XID wraparound - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: [PATCH] Clarify the behavior of the system when approaching XID wraparound
Date
Msg-id CAH2-WzmKhFhc3XQQzHAjoF=TdAnFJ95Hat3Yj9wKuyKJZq6KXQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Clarify the behavior of the system when approaching XID wraparound  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 7:55 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> Obviously there are certain things that can hold back OldestMXact by a
> wildly excessive amount. But I don't think that there is anything that
> can hold back OldestMXact by a wildly excessive amount that won't more
> or less do the same thing to OldestXmin.

Actually, it's probably possible for a transaction that only has a
virtual transaction ID to call MultiXactIdSetOldestVisible(), which
will then have the effect of holding back OldestMXact without also
holding back OldestXmin (in READ COMMITTED mode).

Will have to check to make sure, but that won't happen today.

--
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: shveta malik
Date:
Subject: Re: Support logical replication of DDLs
Next
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: Overhauling "Routine Vacuuming" docs, particularly its handling of freezing