Re: Should we put command options in alphabetical order in the doc? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Should we put command options in alphabetical order in the doc?
Date
Msg-id CAH2-WzkzxyGCLBYR8f9mGNdbR8HZuXX2_79G85=1NwHEeNLcvg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we put command options in alphabetical order in the doc?  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Should we put command options in alphabetical order in the doc?
Re: Should we put command options in alphabetical order in the doc?
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 4:18 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> "Importance order" just seems horribly subjective to me.

Alphabetical order seems objectively bad. At least to me.

> I'd be interested to know if you could tell me if SKIP_LOCKED has more
> importance than INDEX_CLEANUP, for example. If you can, it would seem
> like trying to say apples are more important than oranges, or
> vice-versa.

I don't accept your premise that the only thing that matters (or the
most important thing) is adherence to some unambiguous and consistent
order.

--
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we put command options in alphabetical order in the doc?
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: allow_in_place_tablespaces vs. pg_basebackup