Re: Vacuum ERRORs out considering freezing dead tuples from before OldestXmin - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Vacuum ERRORs out considering freezing dead tuples from before OldestXmin
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wzkrowjc2v-DML0zA2gHF=+KzFvodoyPKR-4hLND7XVZsQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Vacuum ERRORs out considering freezing dead tuples from before OldestXmin  (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Vacuum ERRORs out considering freezing dead tuples from before OldestXmin
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 9:32 AM Melanie Plageman
<melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote:
> Andres has suggested in the past that we allow maintenance_work_mem be
> set to a lower value or introduce some kind of development GUC so that
> we can more easily test multiple pass index vacuuming. Do you think
> this would be worth it?

No, I don't.

--
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [18] Policy on IMMUTABLE functions and Unicode updates
Next
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove dependence on integer wrapping