Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse
Date
Msg-id CAH2-WzkarKuhw_QnaW-i0unz=P5kFJYa0acXx-Z-Ko_6cBHNYg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 10:15 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > As well as the age of OldestXmin at the start of VACUUM.
>
> Is it worth capturing and logging both of those numbers?  Why is
> the age at the end more interesting than the age at the start?

As Andres said, that's often more interesting because most of the time
OldestXmin is not held back by much (not enough to matter).

Users will often look at the output of successive related VACUUM
operations. Often the way things change over time is much more
interesting than the details at any particular point in time.
Especially in the kinds of extreme cases I'm thinking about.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Intermittent buildfarm failures on wrasse
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Crash in new pgstats code