Re: [PATCH] Clarify the behavior of the system when approaching XID wraparound - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: [PATCH] Clarify the behavior of the system when approaching XID wraparound
Date
Msg-id CAH2-WzkVw6RXaQzAubyRbPMvwouV1TphhhTSdbDktGD1ARkRSg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Clarify the behavior of the system when approaching XID wraparound  (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Clarify the behavior of the system when approaching XID wraparound
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 11:46 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
> What is the status of this patch discussion now?  It had been set as
> Ready for Committer for some months.  Do these recent discussions
> invalidate that?  Does it need more discussion?

I don't think that recent discussion invalidated anything. I meant to
follow-up on investigating the extent to which anything could hold up
OldestMXact without also holding up OldestXmin/removable cutoff, but
that doesn't seem essential.

This patch does indeed seem "ready for committer". John?

--
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: pgstatindex vs. !indisready
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Making the subquery alias optional in the FROM clause