Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade
Date
Msg-id CAH2-WzkSDDY4yE=RfMoh6Q=HO5DeW0fh_dct9_CLVb03vi0QkQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 12:15 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Given that the old cluster is suffering no new write
> transactions, there's probably exactly two values that are legal: one
> being the value from the old cluster, which we know, and the other
> being whatever a vacuum of that table would produce, which we don't
> know, although we do know that it's somewhere in that range.

What about autoanalyze?

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade