On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 4:23 AM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote:
> So IIUC the issue here is that the code could previously record useless
> collation version dependencies in somes cases, which could lead to false
> positive possible corruption messages (and of course additional bloat on
> pg_depend). False positive messages can't be avoided anyway, as a collation
> version update may not corrupt the actually indexed set of data, especially for
> glibc.
This argument seems completely absurd to me.
--
Peter Geoghegan
