Re: Fast default stuff versus pg_upgrade - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Fast default stuff versus pg_upgrade
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wzk6hE0XXFyhgS_DNtg6EifCzstHSM7c2UgR=6bS-aA=rQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fast default stuff versus pg_upgrade  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 10:12 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have to admit that I think this feature is scary. I'm not sure that
> it was adequately reviewed and tested, and I'm worried this may not be
> the only problem it causes. But this particular problem, as Andres
> says, doesn't seem like anything we can't fix with acceptable risk.

I agree with both points.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Excessive CPU usage in StandbyReleaseLocks()
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: [WIP] [B-Tree] Retail IndexTuple deletion