Re: Hash index bucket split bug - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Hash index bucket split bug
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wz=qCx-2fpB0vec3fTGOnY8=mJ3O+6JY5V+V+mWDxV=fXQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: Hash index bucket split bug  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 9, 2026 at 11:24 AM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> Attached v2 has a more stable version of the isolation test (no other
> changes compared to V1). Does this version work for you?

I ran this against CI, and saw failures on 32-bit meson tied to tuple
alignment. When MAXALIGN is 4, the assumptions about page layout
underlying the test case break.

Attached is V3, which directly addresses the alignment issue, and
fully passes CI.

--
Peter Geoghegan

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thom Brown
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL/JSON json_table plan clause
Next
From: Jacob Champion
Date:
Subject: Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread