Re: effective_io_concurrency's steampunk spindle maths - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: effective_io_concurrency's steampunk spindle maths
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wz=k2UvfJujaCZrss1NiarVSfU4OL=a3p+wA5_kgPzz-5w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: effective_io_concurrency's steampunk spindle maths  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: effective_io_concurrency's steampunk spindle maths
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 9:27 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 12:20 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Here's a patch set to remove the spindle stuff, add a maintenance
> > variant, and use the maintenance one in
> > heap_compute_xid_horizon_for_tuples().
>
> Pushed.

Shouldn't you close out the "Should we rename
effective_io_concurrency?" Postgres 13 open item now?

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Our naming of wait events is a disaster.