Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit?
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wz=WQ9ju6sjPF7RcW0g6NPXAenZeC5qVme6uj+eMRw5q2g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit?  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit?  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 9:42 PM David Rowley
<david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> The current default vacuum_cost_limit of 200 seems to be 15 years old
> and was added in f425b605f4e.
>
> Any supporters for raising the default?

I also think that the current default limit is far too conservative.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit?
Next
From: "Imai, Yoshikazu"
Date:
Subject: RE: speeding up planning with partitions