On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 2:10 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure about this bit; sounds a bit like what has been qualified
> as "nannyism" elsewhere. Suppose I want to give a hash table 2GB of
> memory for whatever reason. If my work_mem is default (4MB) then I
> cannot possibly achieve that without altering both settings.
>
> So I propose that maybe we do want a maximum value, but if so it should
> be higher than what you propose. I think 10000 is acceptable in that it
> doesn't get in the way.
That's a good point.
I amend my proposal: the maximum allowable value of
hash_mem_multiplier should be 10000.0 (i.e., ten thousand times
whatever work_mem is set to, which is subject to the existing work_mem
sizing restrictions).
--
Peter Geoghegan
