Re: POC: Better infrastructure for automated testing of concurrency issues - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: POC: Better infrastructure for automated testing of concurrency issues
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wz=9nLNtRWEaVGSEhA3ZoLy+5fdGFjqkVMTTUM9K5uz8YQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: POC: Better infrastructure for automated testing of concurrency issues  (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 1:20 PM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you for your feedback.  We probably can't think over everything
> in advance.  We can start with configure option enabled for developers
> and some buildfarm animals.  That causes no risk of overhead in
> standard builds.  After some time, we may reconsider to enable stop
> events even in standard build if we see they cause no regression.

I'll start using the configure option for debug builds only as soon as
possible. It will easily work with my existing workflow.

I don't know about anyone else, but for me this is only a very small
inconvenience. Whereas the convenience of not having to think about
the performance impact seems huge.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: A few new options for CHECKPOINT
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Removal of operator_precedence_warning