Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Zipfian distribution in pgbench - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Zipfian distribution in pgbench
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wz=6e7udS0y0WpdNw4nUFXjkz7LCKAN0DCvRwsn7E66_7g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Zipfian distribution in pgbench  (Alik Khilazhev <a.khilazhev@postgrespro.ru>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Zipfian distribution in pgbench
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 4:38 AM, Alik Khilazhev
<a.khilazhev@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> I am attaching results of test for 32 and 128 clients for original and
> patched(_bt_doinsert) variants.

Thanks.

The number of leaf pages at the left hand side of the leaf level seems
to be ~50 less than the unpatched 128 client case was the first time
around, which seems like a significant difference. I wonder why. Maybe
autovacuum ran at the right/wrong time this time around?

Did you happen to record TPS for this most recent set of tests?

I notice one possibly interesting thing from these new numbers: the 32
client case is slightly more bloated when unique index enforcement is
removed.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL - Weak DH group