Re: Optionally using a better backtrace library? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Optionally using a better backtrace library?
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wz=3_=1jtfis5Y-M2cfu=v6a-wZquozCWGKEAmkCtDfbVw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Optionally using a better backtrace library?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 2:59 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> Much appreciated!  I can put this to good use.

I was just reminded of how our existing backtrace support is lacklustre.

Are you planning on submitting a patch for this?

--
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: common signal handler protection
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Changing references of password encryption to hashing