Re: Improve search for missing parent downlinks in amcheck - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Improve search for missing parent downlinks in amcheck
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wz=36A7KmVv6SDh7m7qZpAjzuk6vbx2EwpcZH0mrT+etZg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Improve search for missing parent downlinks in amcheck  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jul 7, 2019 at 7:53 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 12:58 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> > I will think about a simple fix, but after the upcoming point release.
> > There is no hurry.
>
> A bureaucratic question:  What should the status be for this CF entry?

I have plans to use RelationGetNumberOfBlocks() to size amcheck's
downlink Bloom filter. I think that that will solve the problems with
unreliable estimates of index size. which seemed to be the basis of
Alexander's complaint.

--
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Add parallelism and glibc dependent only options to reindexdb
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Add \warn to psql