On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 5:19 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 3:18 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > Hm. I wonder if it's not actually good to do something like it in 14, given
> > that we know of a path to have corrupted indexes out there.
>
> My concern is that people might not be too happy about errors that
> occur due to corruption in tuples that are only vaguely related to
> their own incoming inserted tuple.
Attached patch adds ERRORs in the event of detecting
index-tuple-TID-points-to-LP_UNUSED conditions, as well as other
similar conditions -- not just assertions, as before.
I do think that this would be a good idea on HEAD. Still have
reservations about doing that for 14, but you're welcome to try and
change my mind.
Thoughts?
--
Peter Geoghegan
