Re: BUG #17619: AllocSizeIsValid violation in parallel hash join - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: BUG #17619: AllocSizeIsValid violation in parallel hash join
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wz=+K9K+RYKLyDbPsp_gKfM_2YS-8zU4NxDY+EJ132cLMw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to BUG #17619: AllocSizeIsValid violation in parallel hash join  (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 6:31 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> Uh, why is it okay that we don't zero-initialize memory used for
> things like PARALLEL_KEY_BUFFER_USAGE and PARALLEL_KEY_WAL_USAGE?

Ping? I'm pretty sure that this needs to be fixed.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #17385: "RESET transaction_isolation" inside serializable transaction causes Assert at the transaction end
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #17619: AllocSizeIsValid violation in parallel hash join