Re: WAL consistency check facility - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kuntal Ghosh
Subject Re: WAL consistency check facility
Date
Msg-id CAGz5QCKhHxmJbUV9YWKQsv8dP6nGA0=a3V9kd6SJbo8GEvSCFA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WAL consistency check facility  (Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've updated the patch for review.
>
If an inconsistency is found, it'll just log it for now. Once, the
patch is finalized, we can
change it to FATAL as before. I was making sure that all regression
tests should pass with the patch.
It seems that there is some inconsistency in regression tests for BRIN index.

LOG:  Inconsistent page found, rel 1663/16384/30607, forknum 0, blkno 1
CONTEXT:  xlog redo at 0/9BAE08C8 for BRIN/UPDATE+INIT: heapBlk 100
pagesPerRange 1 old offnum 11, new offnum 1

-- 
Thanks & Regards,
Kuntal Ghosh
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Banck
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reload SSL certificates on SIGHUP
Next
From: Corey Huinker
Date:
Subject: Re: Making table reloading easier