Re: WAL consistency check facility - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kuntal Ghosh
Subject Re: WAL consistency check facility
Date
Msg-id CAGz5QCKOe=qcCYGozX-y+3rqHWm7ayGa0aYbT7htLiDpYZzChg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WAL consistency check facility  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 3:36 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 1:36 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> So, who are all of the people involved in the effort to produce this
>> patch, and what's the right way to attribute credit?
>
> The original idea was from Heikki as he has introduced the idea of
> doing such checks if you look at the original thread. I added on top
> of it a couple of things like the concept of page masking, and hacked
> an early version of the versoin we have now
> (https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqR4vxdKijP+Du82vOcOnGMvutq-gfqiU2dsH4bsM77hYg@mail.gmail.com).
> So it seems to me that marking Heikki as an author would be fair as
> the original idea is from him. I don't mind being marked only as a
> reviewer of the feature, or as someone from which has written an
> earlier version of the patch, but I let that up to your judgement.
> Kuntai is definitely an author.
Although lot of changes have been done later, but I've started with the patch
attached in the above thread. Hence, I feel the author of that patch should
also get the credit.

-- 
Thanks & Regards,
Kuntal Ghosh
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Do we need use more meaningful variables to replace 0 in catalog head files?
Next
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: [PATCH] Allow TAP tests to be run individually