On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 4:07 AM Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I would say this should be considered a resounding success. We should
> probably add an alternative result file to cover this case, but
> otherwise I don't see anything which requires action.
>
As of now, we've added an extra expected file for the same.
> Congratulations on making this work so well!
>
Thanks for developing the serializable module in a nice decoupled architecture.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Kuntal Ghosh
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
