On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> That's without the patch in
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20161123083351.5vramz52nmdokhzz%40alap3.anarazel.de
>> ? With that patch it should complete without that change, right?
>>
> No, it's with the patch in the above link which is
> 0001-Resize-simplehash.h-table-in-case-of-long-runs.patch. But, I've
> kept the SH_FILLFACTOR to 0.8 and SH_MAX_FILLFACTOR to 0.95. I'll do
> another round of testing with the constants provided by you.
>
I've tested with the patch
0001-Resize-simplehash.h-table-in-case-of-long-runs.patch and the
results are same, i.e., hash table grows even when it is only 10-12%
filled. I've attached the logfile for reference.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Kuntal Ghosh
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
