Home > mailing lists

Re: [GENERAL] Is PL-PGSQL interpreted or complied? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From	Tim Uckun
Subject	Re: [GENERAL] Is PL-PGSQL interpreted or complied?
Date	July 6, 2017 15:32:00
Msg-id	CAGuHJrM6kqpoqoUBxGU200NQP1zaD=r6CaP2r=BDS0NhHFPvbw@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw
In response to	Re: [GENERAL] Is PL-PGSQL interpreted or complied? (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List	pgsql-general

Tree view

Interesting, thank you. I was curious to know how it worked.

Cheers.

pgsql-general by date:

From: Yong Zhang
Date: 06 July 2017, 14:10:53
Subject: [GENERAL] pg_rewind could not find previous WAL record at 0/4B000060: invalidrecord length at 0/4B000060: wanted 24, got 0

From: Steve DeLong
Date: 06 July 2017, 20:44:15
Subject: [GENERAL] Trying to reduce xlog wal files

Re: [GENERAL] Is PL-PGSQL interpreted or complied? - Mailing list pgsql-general

Previous

Next