Re: [HACKERS] Online DW - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Sridhar N Bamandlapally
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Online DW
Date
Msg-id CAGuFTBVQs8nWj59VnES+aCeb+K6eQtpYJ+nwg3srkkZND3K2qQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Online DW  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Online DW
Re: [HACKERS] Online DW
List pgsql-general

This is what I feel will give me solution to maintain production (current+7days) and archive(current+history) without any etl/scheduler

But there is no feature available in any database

Sridhar
Opentext

On 10 Jun 2016 19:03, "Craig Ringer" <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
On 10 June 2016 at 18:56, John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com> wrote:
On 6/10/2016 2:18 AM, Sridhar N Bamandlapally wrote:
This/These will be performed in Production to clean-up archive which will not be sync with Archive/DW DB only

one heads-up is Archive/DW DB may need to build WITHOUT CONSTRAINTS

May need to introduce ARCHIVE system/tag in pg_hba.conf

there's a whole lot of implied magic here unless you want to get way more specific what these features do, exactly, under all possible conditions.

I'd go further than that and say I can't see how something like this could possibly work with physical (block based) replication. It's total hand-waving.

--
 Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Rakesh Kumar
Date:
Subject: What is the general opinion on use of tablespaces
Next
From: Sridhar N Bamandlapally
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Online DW