Re: BBU still needed with SSD? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Klaus Ita
Subject Re: BBU still needed with SSD?
Date
Msg-id CAGrfkYOT9iUofFMrmBcxtHtgLxsDUa2W8FgCFW5pQ=GBaiy9fg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BBU still needed with SSD?  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Have you also created your partitions with a reasonably new fdisk (or
equivalent) with -c -u as options?

Your partitions should be starting somewhere at 2048 i guess (let the
sw figure that out). The fast degradation of the one disk might
indicate bad partitioning? (maybe recheck with a grml.iso or something
alike http://www.grml.org/ )
Also, ... did you know that any unused space in the disk is being used
as bad block 'replacement'? so just leave out 1-2 GB space at the end
of your disk to make use of this 'feature'

otherwise, mdadm supports raid1 with more than 2 drives. I havent seen
this configuration much but it makes absolute sense on drives where
you expect failure. (i am not speaking spare, but really raid1 with >
2 drives).

I like this setup, with ssd drives it might be the solution to decay.

regs,
klaus

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Andrzej Nakonieczny
Date:
Subject: Re: Large rows number, and large objects
Next
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Intel 320 series drives firmware bug