Re: C testing for Postgres - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jesse Zhang
Subject Re: C testing for Postgres
Date
Msg-id CAGf+fX4hzpfkzT816jgMpfSNjyWc0_JZARCMVmQi1MO2Yk8AsQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: C testing for Postgres  (Adam Berlin <aberlin@pivotal.io>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 10:37 AM Adam Berlin <aberlin@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
> If we were to use this tool, would the community want to vendor the
> framework in the Postgres repository, or keep it in a separate
> repository that produces a versioned shared library?
>

If the library is going to actively evolve, we should bring it into the
tree. For a project like this, a "versioned shared library" is a massive
pain in the rear for both the consumer of such libraries and for their
maintainers.

Cheers,
Jesse



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: cleanup & refactoring on reindexdb.c
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL/JSON: JSON_TABLE