Thanks for letting us know, will be happy to see it appear.
Regards,
Koen De Groote
On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 11:15 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 06:52:34PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 09:07:38AM +1100, Peter Smith wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 2:16 AM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 11:48:16PM +0200, Koen De Groote wrote: > > > > Number 2 would be perfect, I think. It leaves no doubt at all. > > > > > > I went with even more direct wording, patch attached. Glad we could > > > improve this together --- the feedback from everyone was helpful. > > > > > > > One small nit -- I think "PostgreSQL" typically would have SGML markup: > > > > <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> > > Yes, I thought so too, but if you look at the SGML, it uses PostgreSQL > with no markup in many places close to this sentence, e.g. "PostgreSQL > supports both mechanisms concurrently".
